Can Machine Translation Carry a Legal Right?
Machine translation can widen access to courts, but testimony, consent and authoritative legal texts still need accountable human interpretation and a clear path to correction.
Human-centred technology—from everyday life to deep engineering.
Human-centred technology in government, democracy, cities, institutions and public services.
Machine translation can widen access to courts, but testimony, consent and authoritative legal texts still need accountable human interpretation and a clear path to correction.
Guided legal forms can make justice easier to enter, but they must recognise uncertainty, urgency and vulnerability—and know when to transfer control to a person.
Private vendors can strengthen public digital services, but rights-critical infrastructure must remain understandable, auditable, operable and genuinely replaceable.
Automation saves little if one wrong decision forces a person through an opaque maze. Build notification, evidence, tracking and human review as one usable appeal journey.
Government data control requires more than a dashboard. It must reveal sources, access and decisions, then carry corrections and appeals through every affected service.
What if the birth of a child, a lost job or a move automatically brought the right public services to you? Event-driven government promises less bureaucracy—but raises profound questions about…
The “Surprise Candidate” is a Myth. Here’s How the Machine Actually Works. Every few years, the political media complex gets to tell its favorite fairy tale. It goes like this:…